Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think if anything can be corrected at the RAW stage (the negative), it is much better to do it there than at the tiff stage (the print). I still think of this in darkroom terms. I would much rather dodge and burn as I'm exposing the negative than try to correct the print after the fact. The non-destructive editing in LR is fantastic and if I can correct things there before converting and going to PS, then I'll do it. There are still a few things that have to be done in PS, but they are getting less and less as LR gets more and more effective. Tina On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2010 at 11:28 AM +1000, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > >> Both global and local adjustments can be applied en masse if required, >> which >> can be a very large productivity gain. So is working non-destructively. >> Don't be afraid, expand your Photoshop mindset into the Raw era! >> > > While this specific example sounds like it might be more suited for > correction in a RAW processing program, it's quite easy to make an action > that runs a batch of operations on many files at once in Photoshop. > > From my reading online, I've reached the point of view that some people > would actually do well to expand out of the RAW mindset sometimes and do > some of their processing in Photoshop. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com