Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Foothill Park
From: rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
References: <747098.9554.qm@web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <BD38DC430E434F79B63832050B44DA53@jimnichols> <BANLkTinCi_aYvnyQwfM+g=DF=yB+4gFX4Q@mail.gmail.com> <73337DCD-F5D6-473E-8D88-47F701682A26@yahoo.com> <BANLkTi=FSkpi_ohAbE0OniE6JSZQ0C_OZw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=+M1BLnkM8Lv96PF2V3uYRUq2dHg@mail.gmail.com> <445631.37765.qm@web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <45483E93-FFE8-494A-B02C-6DEAFE743F3F@mac.com> <BANLkTim36en9bKRqCLbhAy-KX6MFHH+3Zw@mail.gmail.com> <A4DAF305-866A-4453-A3F9-CC58C984EB8E@yahoo.com> <0E6F0344-95E3-45C7-B662-BD13399721F3@mac.com>

I was afraid of that...
Thanks George.
Bob
?Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
http://www.rgaphoto.com 




________________________________
From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 9:02:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Foothill Park


On Apr 12, 2011, at 12:44 AM, Bob Adler wrote:

> Now here's where I get messed up. If I want to use tilt to get near/far 
> for the 
>entire stitched image, I think I have to focus and tilt when the back is in 
>full 
>rise position (for near objects) and then refocus and re-tilt when it's in 
>the 
>full fall position (for far objects). Or, do I only need to use tilt when 
>I'm in 
>the full rise position (on the nearer objects) and no tilt focusing, but do 
>refocus for distance, when in the full fall position (on the far objects)."


The problem lies with your not being able to
view the entire frame you intend to capture (in sections),
as you focus and tilt.

So you must continuously adjust - shift - focus - adjust - shift - focus - 
etc.
until you arrive at something close to what you're looking for.

Even with a view camera we must essentially do the same thing;
though we're able to view the entire frame as we're doing it.

What you're really looking for is a something like a 3.25" x 4.25" sensor 
back.
;~?) 

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist






_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



      


Replies: Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Foothill Park)