Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:05:52 -0500
References: <BANLkTi=qwCsuSPr8dLknLOeMhS5aUzK4bw@mail.gmail.com> <p06230904c9ca3cc328d9@[192.168.1.21]>
 
On Apr 12, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:

> While many people, Nathan and Howard Cummer among them, have had problems 
> with their M8s there have also been many who haven't had any issue. Mine 
> (non-upgraded) have been just fine, and I didn't treat them any 
> differently than I treated earlier Leicas. Many tens of thousands of 
> photos, and they weren't babied and show the signs of use on edges and 
> slight dings. If the rangefinder is in proper adjustment everything works 
> just fine.


Likewise.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from john.o.newell at comcast.net (J. Newell) ([Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8)
Reply from rhart76 at gmail.com (Roger Hart) ([Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8)
 In reply to: Message from simon.ogilvie at gmail.com (Simon Ogilvie) ([Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Comparing micro 4/3 and M8)