Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:42:12 +0930
References: <BLU0-SMTP83B191AFFD2D90C0C7D4538C510@phx.gbl> <Pine.GSO.4.62.1106212203150.17387@duke.poly.edu> <BANLkTikgMj1PRdP93UWhfdnpjcxACOTUzw@mail.gmail.com> <EEEEF171-5213-4BC2-B374-53A0638A9C76@mac.com>
That's a lovely shot George.
> my
> Leitz Wetzlar 35 mm Summicron-R (28199XX)
> (I have no idea what version this is - or whether its Mandler -
> can anyone inform me?)
I think that's the Mandler one - is it e55 with a built-in hood?
That and the Summilux, you're spoilt for choice.
Marty
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from alal at poly.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)