Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?
From: rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAD73D25.16401%mark@rabinergroup.com> <787A2EE1-7962-46B9-A113-F067253E4CCB@mac.com> <059e01cc9b2b$b6d03860$2470a920$@gmail.com>
 
Yup.? It's just that those of us who do understand this stuff know that (a) 
the differences are sufficiently inconsequential due to rounding errors that 
they can be largely ignored (because nobody's shooting K14 any more) , and 
(b) There are photos to be made and that's MUCH more interesting than 
playing games with the numbers.

?
R. Clayton McKee
PhotoJournalist
from somewhere just south of somewhere else...


>________________________________
>From: Piers Hemy <piers.hemy at gmail.com>
>To: 'Leica Users Group' <lug at leica-users.org>
>Sent: Friday, November 4, 2011 2:55 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?
>
>Doesn't anyone read their Gossen exposure meter manual anymore?
>
>
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)
Message from piers.hemy at gmail.com (Piers Hemy) ([Leica] 1.8 vs. 1.4!?!?)