Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:30:00 -0700
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E94919E4FA@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CB882939.1BA7A%mark@rabinergroup.com> <000801cd032f$7b7e1860$727a4920$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CAH1UNJ0xDP02XShXb7ZOCDhw1G9aFu3qeueDZBUjK+XOVn6xvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxsAvoCKVRg40PbgdOpF=x4vAfOM++PBjz0wvwoeAtc92w@mail.gmail.com> <FBB4B81B-09F1-4FD7-BE13-B1C81F15A2AB@gmail.com> <CAFfkXxsFO4n_mvQjbDE8m5Vkj-k7063YDw_MKzDYPp5=mO=v9A@mail.gmail.com> <B3AC04F0-AAB7-4FB3-B624-118C5AD843B2@mac.com> <CAH1UNJ072Pv=VAGSf0c0kHcuU6msmtZ_8Lko5QLzEN=3MkOShg@mail.gmail.com> <DCC041E4-DADF-4A4A-9014-6316EAD0F3DB@mac.com> <F2F28A47-0B22-4EE7-869C-6D4361445A06@mac.com> <BLU0-SMTP86F2BF8B7372D24C026C2D8C5F0@phx.gbl> <10B9A568-A531-409B-BDE3-D559CD209B7C@mac.com>

I've shot a fair bit with Hasselblads, but when it comes to speed the Mamiya 
645 beat it handily. Best move I made was getting the M645 for construction 
and aerial shooting. Only thing was I still needed the Hasselblad SWC 
because the Mamiya 35mm was a dog. The lenses between 50mm and 110mm were 
extremely good, and some beyond that as well, and with a winder it made a 
very competent package. I used it for aerial photography, and with a bundle 
of preloaded film inserts it was overall quicker to use than 35mm (next to 
no reloading time) as long as you didn't need to shoot more than about 1 
frame per second. Shooting with the 50/4 shift lens was also as fast and 
handy as using the 28mmPC on a Nikon.

On the other hand, street shooting isn't where the M645 shone.


On 2012-03-16, at 11:39 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> 
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Vick Ko wrote:
> 
>> And, a Hasselblad is as fast as an M.
> 
> Having shot both Hasselbad and Ms for nearly 5 decades
> I can't agree with this Vick.
> 
> No way does the 'blad compete with the M for "speed."
> not in focusing
> not in film advancing
> not in shutter releasing
> not in f:stop speed
> and
> not in steady shots at any given shutter speed : focal length ratio
> 
> though a Rolleiflex does compete well in terms of "speed"
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser 
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


Henning Wulff
henningw at archiphoto.com






In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)