Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:40:14 -0500
References: <D59E7A08-5391-4E18-9732-9809D059C33D@bex.net> <432A2EFC-0263-4091-91BE-EAE209DCD637@archiphoto.com> <3B0D4704-7D13-46B3-B3D0-966540530D6A@bex.net>
 
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Howard Ritter <hlritter at bex.net> wrote:

For that matter, I'd like to see a corresponding portion of a DNG file of
yours that represents the M9's true performance.



http://sonc.com/look/?p=1888

http://sonc.com/look/?p=1858
(full frame after the crop)

http://sonc.com/look/?p=1809


All shot with a Summaron 35mm lens  (built in 1962)  severely cropped shot
raw, made into jpegs.



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
http://sonc-hegr.tumblr.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana

USA
Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison)
 In reply to: Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison)