Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Jim's thread on pixel-peepers / equipment molesters /...
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:08:32 +0530
References: <CAF8hL-EATaiEu77yfhOk1DEcCLA5Pd9RryjzbMLDgGLn_Hw7_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxuH6QCzdNWsZmOeoRFOnp5dxPPRGYn+N_7fvgnG3_pSgA@mail.gmail.com>
 
He would afford it without breaking a sweat - he was born a one percenter!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:49 PM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > .I mean $7195 for a Summicron? Really? I think even HCB might
> > > balk at that! ;)
>
> He probably wouldn't have to balk at it, Leica would supply him one.
>
> I presume they supplied him the 40mm Minilux he used in his last years.
>
> I've read he was quite a gearhead.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://sonc.com/look/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Jim's thread on pixel-peepers / equipment molesters /...)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Jim's thread on pixel-peepers / equipment molesters /...)