Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries
From: lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz)
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 03:42:36 -0400
References: <CAFuU78fDnU8PVFgH8nwKsFzEPm77vU_-0H9LHiG50txY9EJS+A@mail.gmail.com> <49E2D15BD1AA4D48A162CFF52611D9AD@billHP> <CAFuU78exZ+hBLfzQNZUU8OKZY5En01KUfSgxYtpt-h_ML9na+A@mail.gmail.com> <001301cd745b$b9c40650$2d4c12f0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <5817CFF8-45A7-4AFA-810E-DF0124D3DFCA@acm.org>

The magic way is to embed an id chip in the battery.

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote:

> I would be willing to make a substantial bet that there is no magic way
> that Leica can tell if you are using an aftermarket battery. After getting
> a DOA aftermarket battery, I bit the bullet and bought a Leica battery as
> my spare. When I tried to install the update, it told me that there was not
> enough battery juice, and I had to replace this genuine battery by another
> genuine one that had a full charge.  Obviously they are going by battery
> voltage under load and objecting if there is a chance of failure during the
> firmware update process.
>
> Herbert Kanner
> kanner at acm.org
> 650-326-8204
>
> Question authority and the authorities will question you.
>
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 10:15 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>
> > The only non-Leica battery I bought (and its replacement) were both DOA
> on
> > earlier firmware ;-) I think it is just a warning on remaining power
> rather
> > than hunting non-genuine batteries..........
> >
> > john
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > My understanding is that you may get a warning, but that they will still
> > work. If they're DOA, I'm screwed.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> This no aftermarket battery thing is a real pain. If they hadn't
> >> charged so much for something that is obviously available for much
> >> less, they could have saved money on writing special firmware. Not
> >> something that makes me feel good about the manufacturers.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Can anyone report from the field if the update will reject my
> >> non-Leica batteries? Not looking forward to replacing them. Also, will
> >> the Leica only battery injunction be enforced on the MM and M10?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
-Lew Schwartz


Replies: Reply from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)