Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] TRI-X: RIP
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:44:21 -0500
References: <CAFuU78eL5M7EmQA6Om3PgD7jGxqtjAKAc5CbO1jtfETU=HgWTw@mail.gmail.com> <720721F2-EDD1-4A7A-87AB-21E785BD6049@embarqmail.com>
 
HP5 was always a bit too muddy and contrasty for me (at least for my 
developing routine). 

Regards,

Jeffery
______________________
Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
www.400tx.com





On Aug 25, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> wrote:

> here, too
> 
> ric
> 
> 
> On Aug 25, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> My main iso 400 film has been HP5+ for years
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)
Reply from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)
 In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)