Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] NZ PAW 35
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 09:38:55 +0200
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99651E094@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <CC670BC9.23025%mark@rabinergroup.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99651E222@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <CAE3QcF61c=sajJDVbeBBgBGJtR7Vbvfe70yXRg+ttiQqALRVZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Le 1 sept. 12 ? 08:47, Geoff Hopkinson a ?crit :
> John I'd add that one of the things emerging from the early testers
> is that
> the contrast range from camera looks so different and developing
> will need
> to be learned, just like for any new spophisticated tool.
Just what I feel - the whites look so so so far - usually a nocti
impediment I dislike.
Just my two cents - the rest of the range is perfectly ok to my eye
(Imac, uncalibrated)
Ph
Replies:
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 35)
In reply to:
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 35)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] NZ PAW 35)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 35)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] NZ PAW 35)