Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 reliability question - from the Leica Website
From: meino at innerside.demon.nl (Meino de Graaf)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:40:35 +0200
References: <B7874C91-D17C-48C3-BC3C-784AC35909F6@frozenlight.eu> <1C283978-5E5B-42A7-9426-847318EB9DE0@verizon.net> <8C2E4D5B-683B-4203-9445-2F252B03264D@frozenlight.eu> <4DD9B80B905042C0AE2094B3CF004498@Family> <8BD30673-2951-4668-BFA5-0ACD38D78C93@frozenlight.eu> <6d3cf876-b755-31c7-41ff-f3c06c7472dd@lighttube.net> <9562ba8e-e2b8-0ee5-08c6-1d2c62dd6529@gmx.de> <65007428-d658-b839-098c-3c06fa0ed702@lighttube.net> <9467ECB8-73F5-4CE0-A1D4-6F7740AB7E32@frozenlight.eu>

The new firmware is downwards compatible with the old sensor. The new 
sensor needs the new firmware, So yes the fact that the latest firmware 
is present is not a good sign that the new sensor is installed.

regards

Meino de Graaf

On 6/2/2016 6:54 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> This is confusing, though. How can the firmware version indicate the 
> sensor? What if I have an M9 with the original sensor and just update the 
> firmware myself?
> It seems from Douglas post that it is safer to go by date of replacement.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 01 Jun 2016, at 23:30, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote:
>>
>> Douglas,
>>
>>  From the latest posting I could find, the best clue is the Firmware 
>> number.  Apparently, if the new corrosion-less sensor is installed, they 
>> update the Firmware to 1.204.  The previous version, for the earlier 
>> sensor, is 1.202.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>
>> On 6/1/2016 4:19 PM, Douglas Sharp wrote:
>>> http://uk.leica-camera.com/World-of-Leica/Leica-News/About-Leica-News/Global/2015/Update-CCD-Sensor
>>>
>>> *Dated 31/08/2015:*
>>>
>>>
>>>      /"Update CCD Sensor of the Leica M9/M9-P/M
>>>      Monochrom and M-E camera models/
>>>
>>> //
>>>
>>> /We are very pleased to inform you that we have successfully completed 
>>> development on our new generation of CCD sensors and conducted 
>>> subsequent quality assurance testing under practical conditions. As a 
>>> result, Leica Camera AG can now begin replacing the sensors in the M9, 
>>> M9-P and M-E models that were affected by corrosion with sensors from 
>>> the new generation./
>>>
>>> /Sensor replacement for M Monochrom models will also begin shortly. We 
>>> will inform you of the precise date of this as soon as possible./
>>>
>>> /On this note, we would like to remind our customers that we can only 
>>> offer replacements for CCD sensors for cameras affected by this 
>>> particular problem; prophylactic replacement is not possible./
>>>
>>> /We thank you for your patience and for your loyalty to the Leica 
>>> brand."/
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it doesn?t say exactly from when the "new generation" 
>>> replacements are being installed. But it seems to indicate that any 
>>> replacements made before 31 August 2015 must have been with older 
>>> generation sensors.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Douglas
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01.06.2016 23:03, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>>> Nathan & Douglas,
>>>>
>>>> A search turned up this:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/258531-m9-sensor/
>>>>
>>>> Jim Nichols
>>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>>
>>>> On 6/1/2016 3:53 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>>>> I have no idea when the cutover date was. I am basing my statements on 
>>>>> Peter Klein?s post.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Nathan
>>>>>
>>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
>>>>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: 
>>>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
>>>>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
>>>>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>>> YNWA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01 Jun 2016, at 22:43, Douglas Barry <imra at iol.ie> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nathan, I'll pick your brain if I might as a Google search has failed 
>>>>>> to clarify this.
>>>>>> I didn't realise the sensor replacement was date critical. The 
>>>>>> private one near me here in Ireland had its sensor replaced 6 months 
>>>>>> ago by Leica. I presume that's ok? If so, I just might make him an 
>>>>>> offer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Douglas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at 
>>>>>> frozenlight.eu>
>>>>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 8:22 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 reliability question
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks to all who have replied. So the story is not that simple?not 
>>>>>>> only do I need to know whether the sensor has been replaced but also 
>>>>>>> whether it has been replaced with the old one or the new one. I have 
>>>>>>> asked the seller when the replacement got done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And no, I do not want to deal with the hassle of sending a camera to 
>>>>>>> Germany and then waiting for who knows how long. My previous 
>>>>>>> experience sending my M8 for repair back in 2009 or 10 was not that 
>>>>>>> great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Nathan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>>>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
>>>>>>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: 
>>>>>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
>>>>>>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
>>>>>>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>>>>> YNWA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 01 Jun 2016, at 14:22, Frank Verizon 2 2016 <red735i at 
>>>>>>>> verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would buy the one that has not had the sensor replaced, if I 
>>>>>>>> could determine the replacement is required. Then I would send it 
>>>>>>>> in for sensor replacement, getting the complete camera checked out 
>>>>>>>> and adjusted for free.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are those that would say buying a non-current digicam is 
>>>>>>>> silly. You are buying old technology. Not as good. My argument is 
>>>>>>>> that if it does the job you want, when you buy it, the age of the 
>>>>>>>> technology is not relevant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The M9 has proven itself to me to be reliable and a great back end 
>>>>>>>> for Leica glass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> $2500 is a bargain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:05 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
>>>>>>>> frozenlight.eu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have always said that once the M9 prices come down to a level 
>>>>>>>> that I am prepared to pay, I will buy one. Well, in the past week I 
>>>>>>>> have seen two for sale, for $2500 and $2200, respectively. The one 
>>>>>>>> I saw this morning has had the sensor replaced. Those prices are 
>>>>>>>> within my range, but I now have doubts about reliability. Clearly, 
>>>>>>>> buying an M9 that has not had a sensor replacement is out of the 
>>>>>>>> question; but in case one has had it, is the new sensor reliable?or 
>>>>>>>> is it just a matter of time before it starts rotting just like the 
>>>>>>>> original one did? And are there other reliability issues besides 
>>>>>>>> the sensor? Digital Leicas have not had a stellar record.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7598 / Virus Database: 4591/12345 - Release Date: 06/02/16
>
>
>
>



Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Verizon 2 2016) ([Leica] M9 reliability question - from the Leica Website)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 reliability question)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Verizon 2 2016) ([Leica] M9 reliability question)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 reliability question)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] M9 reliability question)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 reliability question)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] M9 reliability question)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] M9 reliability question - from the Leica Website)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] M9 reliability question - from the Leica Website)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 reliability question - from the Leica Website)