Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LEE'S PAW
From: Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 20:25:13 -0700
References: <B72C8EA9.21BF%lbacchus@home.com> <003501c0e141$b5d91300$aba84218@gv.shawcable.net>

Could the tilt be the result of perspective problems that occur when linear
objects such as architectural photos of buildings are photographed?  The
Super Angulon lenses with their perspective correction feature are designed
to address this issue.

> Hi Lee,
>
> PAW colour looks interesting.
>
> My first reaction was, "Damn why didn't he wait for two more steps and
catch
> the guy framed in the doorway?"  Then I noticed the "walk sign" on the
post
> inconjunction  with the person walking.... the step of the walker is in
sync
> with the sign and couldn't have been timed better.
>
> Of course you timed it and shot it exactly as how I explained it?
Right.;-)
> Sure we all know you did .;-)
>
> B&W alternate...... Missed on this one, as it once again appears you were
> motivated by something, then made a grab shot that doesn't appear to have
> captured any central point of interest. I'm of the assumption it's the
> action lady looking over her shoulder, but it still doesn't go anywhere.
>
> I went back and looked several times to see if I had missed something,
nada.
>
> But what I did discover was....... you didn't hold your camera straight!
> Look at the scene carefully and here's what you did that some folks do
> unconsciously when holding an M camera... You tilted the upper right upper
> corner of the camera away from you even though the horizontal line was
> correct.
>
> How do I know this?  Well I sometimes do exactly the same thing myself and
> I've seen in pictures of others. It usually shows up when a building is in
> the scene, the verticals look straight, the horizontals look OK,  but that
> tiny tilt seems to show up when you're screening slides or making a B&W
> print.
>
> It seems more obvious when using a 35 or wider lenses. But this is a
nickel
> and dime remark, as the most important thing is as I said, there doesn't
> appear to be any centre of interest, even the lady looking over her left
> shoulder doesn't do anything. Sorry mate there you go. :-)
> ted
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lee Bacchus" <lbacchus@home.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 8:57 PM
> Subject: [Leica] LEE'S PAW
>
>
> > Duty calls. And so a couple of street shots for this week's PAW
> > (http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=52810).
> > Cheers,
> > Lee Bacchus
> > Vancouver.
> >
>
>

Replies: Reply from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] LEE'S PAW)
In reply to: Message from Lee Bacchus <lbacchus@home.com> ([Leica] LEE'S PAW)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] LEE'S PAW)