Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So I guess Leica designed and is producing, in house, the new 21-35 zoom for nothing. Makes sense. BTW, PMA is a somewhat low level show. I went to and worked at PMA for many many years. It became a minilab show when minilab's were the rage. Now it's a digital show. Booth space cost is w-a-y w-a-y out of sight!!! Bringing out a great piece of photographic gear at PMA is sort of an anit-climax when the show is overrun with digital stuff. I personally would go to PMA only if it were held right here, in San Francisco. I would not travel to Vegas or LA to see it. Both are roughly an hour flight from here. Photokina is where real photography announcements happen. Since the M7 was ready, no harm in bringing it out at PMA. But I believe that Photokina will show Leica's other hand. There seem to be a lot of folks out there that buy and use Leica on one hand, and trash Leica on the other. That makes no sense. BTW, I have an R7 and an R8, a gaggle of lenses, M3, M6x2, etc. I use them all. and I think Leica is doing a great job. The M7 seems to be the right mix of old and new. Familiar with a little sophistication. The R8 is great for changing/moving subjects using the matrix meter. The R7 is like putting on an old comfortable pair of shoes. Tripod. Manual mode. Stop and think. Jim At 08:04 PM 2/27/2002 -0800, Stephen Gandy wrote: >well Mark, > >we all have our favorite cameras, and that is fine. > >but the public seems to disagree with your view of the R8, otherwise it would >be selling better. > >since you like it so much, have you bought one ? > >At PMA, IF Leica had any R display at all, I didn't see it. I was all M and >Digilux. > >Stephen - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html