Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else)
From: RUBEN BLĘDEL FORLAGET RHODOS <ruben@rhodos.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:37:10 +0100
References: <OFA8E64EE8.8FC0624F-ON86256DDA.0052DC33-86256DDA.00538CD5@crnotes2.rockwellcollins.com> <07109E18-13EB-11D8-A7D1-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0311111025220.1257@hedvig.uio.no> <73C42D07-14C0-11D8-994A-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0311120907130.18304@hedvig.uio.no> <FA914297-14EE-11D8-994A-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0311121041170.23227@hedvig.uio.no> <3FB266AE.7040305@osheaven.net> <3FB285C0.3060503@rhodos.dk> <3FB2A5C7.2000403@osheaven.net>

So critical thinking is having a problem with USA not being on top od 
some list...

sam wrote:

> Maybe you don't find it horse poo, but your statement below is not 
> exactly critical thinking.
>
> Sam S
>
>
>
> RUBEN BLĘDEL FORLAGET RHODOS wrote:
>
>> I say thanks to the people that invest their energy in  trying to 
>> speak up for the weak or protests against governments who deny peaple 
>> of the most basic human rights.  I dont care if they are amnesty 
>> international - doctors or reporters without frontiers - the pen 
>> organisation etc. It is never an attack on a country or the people 
>> living in that country - it is an aid to the people of that country 
>> pointing out internationally that things could be better. Theres is 
>> no political agenda  nor a wish to single out Americans as the bad 
>> guys - it is just nice that things like freedom of speach for the 
>> press is monitored and I dont think it is horse shit
>>
>> sam wrote:
>>
>>> The information at the end of the link is perhaps a bit of horse 
>>> shit. The list of questions was not stated, and the people to whom 
>>> they were given were not named. No matter how many times I reread 
>>> the "about us" link, I still don't know who these people are.
>>>
>>> The lack of information about their methodology makes their 
>>> conclutions suspect. I wouldn't be surprised if they have an ax to 
>>> grind.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sam S
>>>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from grduprey@rockwellcollins.com (Re: [Leica] some new snaps, a propos)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] some new snaps, a propos)
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] some new snaps, a propos)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] some new snaps, a propos)
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> ([Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else))
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else))
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else))
Message from RUBEN BLĘDEL FORLAGET RHODOS <ruben@rhodos.dk> (Re: [Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else))
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] Freedom of the press? WAS (something else))