Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd)
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:57:08 +0100 (MET)
References: <200311282227.hASMR5fZ061981@mxsf28.cluster1.charter.net>

Not sure I follow. What is the appellation you are referring to? I wasn't
calling him anything. I was describe a common theme in his academic and
public life (as far as I can tell. I know basically only what has been
said here of his public life).

Daniel

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:

> Thanks for the clarification. In this environment, such an appellation is a
> method of dismissal. A method practiced by both the right and the left.
> Chomsky has certainly been painted by a broad brush by his detractors, and
> that particular one has been the most common.
> Being a card carrying IWW member, albeit for antiquarian reasons, I'm sure
> it must amuse him.
> Slobodan Dimitrov
>
>
> ----------
> >From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >Subject: Re: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd)
> >Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2003, 1:56 PM
> >
>
> > Sorry ... I was afraid it might be a "Swecism".
> >
> > In ancient Greek (through Byzantine times ... not all that ancient) ...
> > there was the "Golden thread". I think it became "red" in Swedish. I
> > translated.
> >
> > I suppose it can be paraphrased as "the common theme", the binding factor
> > that makes sense of otherwise disparate ideas or non-related topics.
> >
> > Not "red" as in political red. "Common ground".
> >
> > Sorry, I did have a feeling it might be "translationese".
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
> >
> >> A 'red thread'! Can you define the term?
> >> I'm only asking for clarity's sake.
> >> Slobodan Dimitrov
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------
> >> >From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
> >> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >> >Subject: RE: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd)
> >> >Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2003, 9:19 AM
> >>
> >> >
> >> > There seems to be a red thread running through his work ... even the
> >> > academic work requires one to think more critically about previously
> >> > accepted truths.
> >> >
> >> > I'll have to check out some of his other works ... thanks.
> >> >
> >> > Daniel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >>
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net> (Re: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd))