Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A Grudging Concession to Digital, Made With Regret
From: "David Rodgers" <davrodgers@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:34:21 -0800
References: <3.0.2.32.20040224215528.00d6d6d4@pop.infionline.net> <1077647624.12186.10.camel@creo_pc3> <LNBBLBNFHNEHGFKFMALGIEPJJOAB.timatherton@theedge.ca> <LNBBLBNFHNEHGFKFMALGIEPJJOAB.timatherton@theedge.ca> <3.0.2.32.20040225193212.0243d738@pop.infionline.net> <403F7224.2C482540@chello.nl>

Nathan,

I'm using a Leafscan that's about 10 years old. It's 4,000 dpi and a match 
for most of the newer desktop scanners. It's a little slow, that's all. One 
of the best all time for scanning b/w.

DaveR


- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nathan Wajsman" <n.wajsman@chello.nl>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] A Grudging Concession to Digital, Made With Regret


> Marc,
>
> You do NOT have to replace the scanner and printer every six months. The
> scanner technology is moving forward, but at a slower pace than computer
> technology in general and definitely much slower than digital image
> capture technology. My Nikon LS-2000 film scanner is 4 or 5 years old,
> and while it has been superceded by newer models, it still produces very
> respectable images with certainly enough resolution to make good 8x10
> prints.
>
> Nathan
>
> Marc James Small wrote:
> >
> > At 03:56 AM 2/25/04 -0500, Dan C wrote:
> > >Just think of what the results will be when you use a better scanner 
> > >and
> > >printer.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks, Dan, for a most thoughtful post.  The truth is that I am 
> > astonished
> > at the results I am getting from an inexpensive scanner and mid-range
> > printer.  I do not want to find myself so committed to digital that I 
> > have
> > to spent $12,000 every six months to upgrade my scanner and printer just 
> > to
> > stay current.  I have normally been satisfied with the purchase of used
> > Leica lenses, and I will probably continue to buy technology from the 
> > last
> > generation.  Darkrrom technology pretty much settled out before the 
> > Second
> > World War, and the advances after that were incremental, as in the 
> > change
> > from normal enlarging lenses to APO models.  Once digital reaches a 
> > similar
> > position of stability, if it does during my lifetime, I will be more
> > interested in purchasing new and top-of-the-line gear.
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > msmall@infionline.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> > Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> -- 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Almere, The Netherlands
>
> e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
> Mobile: +31 630 868 671
>
> http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> ([Leica] A Grudging Concession to Digital, Made With Regret)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> (RE: [Leica] Embedded Brit journalists will receive Iraq Campaignmedal)
Message from Tim Atherton <timatherton@theedge.ca> (RE: [Leica] Embedded Brit journalists will receive Iraq Campaignmedal)
Message from Tim Atherton <timatherton@theedge.ca> (RE: [Leica] Embedded Brit journalists will receive Iraq Campaignmedal)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infionline.net> (Re: [Leica] A Grudging Concession to Digital, Made With Regret)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] A Grudging Concession to Digital, Made With Regret)