Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Sun Nov 5 16:01:08 2006
References: <002401c6ffa0$c79fb2a0$6501a8c0@asus930> <001301c6ffab$ab4e1730$a302a8c0@ted> <454BEB21.4030805@mcclary.net> <000f01c6ffb6$4c719240$a302a8c0@ted> <454C0180.4060200@waltjohnson.com> <668FDF07-1E8E-4160-9E83-B6E0F3B195E8@ncable.net.au> <454CA504.4080501@waltjohnson.com> <454CB890.4090807@mcclary.net> <6BCCA260-D62E-4B7B-B62D-EF465523D34F@comcast.net> <5B480D7F-3BB4-475C-9922-E6BE1E5E4A69@earthlink.net> <848837E0-035A-448A-8E2A-FB748EB0450B@steveunsworth.co.uk> <BF446524-720D-4038-8758-50DB953A4ED8@comcast.net> <p0623093bc173df8055d0@[10.1.16.129]>

Henning

I'll go with Len on this. I'd never thought of using curves in each 
channel.

Thanks, Walt



Henning Wulff wrote:

> At 1:14 PM -0500 11/4/06, Leonard Taupier wrote:
>
>> Steve. I've got some slides to scan today. I'll try both 8 and 16 bit 
>> of the same slide. I've tried 16 bit in the past when I wanted 
>> ultimate quality for a very large print. As I recall the original 
>> tiffs looked pretty much identical and of course the 16 bit files are 
>> now getting really big. I'll play with both files to see if the 16 
>> bit holds up longer.
>>
>> Len
>>
>
> Hi Len,
>
> If you make only small adjustments to a well exposed photo, 8 bit and 
> 16 bit will be essentially the same. On the other hand, if you are 
> struggling to pull detail out of the shadows that you think you saw in 
> the original slide, only 16bit will do. One of the most powerful tool 
> in Photoshop, Curves, really shows the benefits of 16 bits, especially 
> if you use it on individual channels. If you have a slide or digital 
> image that is very flat, and almost everything is medium gray, the 
> Curves tool lets you expand that with very good control, but you'll 
> easily get banding with 8 bit files. 16 bits gives you a chance to 
> rescue these types of shots.
>

In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from harrison at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from harrison at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from vondauster at earthlink.net (Will von Dauster) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re:M8 DNG vs DMR DNG)