Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT Rechargable AAs, (WAS Re: $99 Samsung)
From: michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Fri Jun 8 14:35:03 2007
References: <1be504db0706071741i3f24b0b1l10b1f12de56a777f@mail.gmail.com> <C10D6798-B8B4-433F-A864-BE92C13A7ED4@mindspring.com> <20070608212745.GB28782@panix.com>

Hi,

I use a "la crosse" charger and GP 2300 penlights.
I'm not an expert but have no complaints whatsoever.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema


Rei Shinozuka wrote:
> btw, what's the scoop on a good rechargable AA system nowadays?
> since i almost never use flash, i'm kind of out of the loop.
> there's a lot of batteries made my poeple i've never heard of,
> so i'd to get some testimonials.
> 
> i got a couple of the samsung S630s for my kids (with my kids being so
> competetive and all, it's hard to give one of anything).
> 
> thanks in advance
> 
> -rei
> 
> On Jun07 20:52, Ric Carter wrote:
>> Thanks
>>
>> we're trying the NiMH route -- charging now
>>
>> will check the battery settings as soon as we have power
>>
>> ric
>>
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:41 PM, Phil Swango wrote:
>>
>>> Ric Carter wrote:
>>> Phil Swango wrote a few weeks ago about a $99 Samsung 6 megapixel
>>> camera he picked up.
>>>
>>> What was the model, Phil?
>>> ==========================
>>>
>>> Same one, Ric.  S630.  But I have a couple of comments.  First, the  
>>> Samsung
>>> has a menu setting for type of battery.  The default setting is  
>>> NIMH.  When
>>> I first got mine the switch was set to AA and my first NIMHs didn't  
>>> last
>>> very long either.  Then I changed the switch back to NIMH,  
>>> recharged the
>>> 2300 mah batteries and have had no further problems.  I use the  
>>> camera every
>>> day and only recharge every few days.  I've never kept track of the  
>>> actual
>>> number of shots but I haven't had a (NIMH) battery run down since  
>>> that first
>>> incident.  Considering it's a 2-AA system I'd say battery life is  
>>> about
>>> average.  Maybe not as robust as my Canon, with 4 AAs.  I also keep  
>>> an extra
>>> set of charged batteries in my bag.
>>>
>>> I'm quite happy with the Samsung but there are so many variables in  
>>> picking
>>> a digital camera that it's hard to advise someone else.  I also  
>>> have a Canon
>>> A610, which is a "better" camera, but I prefer using the Samsung.   
>>> For one
>>> thing it's a lot lighter.  I really like having a cheap, worry-free  
>>> camera
>>> in my bag at all times and if I lost it I'd buy another.
>>>
>>> I posted some Samsung shots a while back.  If anyone's interested,  
>>> here's
>>> the link again:
>>>
>>> http://picasaweb.google.com/paswango/Samsung
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Phil Swango
>>> 307 Aliso Dr SE
>>> Albuquerque, NM 87108
>>> 505-262-4085
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] OT Rechargable AAs)
In reply to: Message from pswango at att.net (Phil Swango) ([Leica] Re: $99 Samsung)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Re: $99 Samsung)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] OT Rechargable AAs, (WAS Re: $99 Samsung))