Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG - Fly Away
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Thu Jan 3 10:07:23 2008
References: <C3A1F45E.C742%heninger@adobe.com> <E960FB6A-A22C-4B50-9BE2-08013572EC1B@pandora.be>
 
I agree. I sold the 16-35 2.8L two months after purchasing.
Apparently good ones exist.
I didn't receive a good one. ;~(
The 10-22 is a beauty of a wide angle for smaller chip canons.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07




On Jan 3, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Philippe Orlent wrote:

> BTW: I did a shoot with the 16-35 2.8L: you might get disappointed  
> about its sharpness. Unless if you go for the 2nd version, I suppose.
In reply to: Message from heninger at adobe.com (Wade Heninger) ([Leica] IMG - Fly Away)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] IMG - Fly Away)