Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Got it. Thanks, all makes sense. Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Aug 8, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Brian Reid wrote: > Many good judges can be controversial figures, and when people know > who the judges are, they pick fights with me about it. For example, > BD would have made an excellent judge, but if people knew that he > was a judge, they might not enter because of that, or might try to > engage me in arguments about whether or not he ought to be a judge. > > Last year for about 10 months one of the judges was the photo > editor of a major international publication, who agreed to be a > judge because it amused him. One of his conditions was that he be > totally anonymous. Right now one of the judges is a well-known > figure in the photography world who has never been subscribed to > the LUG and who would resign instantly if his name got out. > >> I totally respect your preference. >> It is, after all, your game. >> >> Still, I remain curious as to why you hold that preference. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information