Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hasselblad sighting (movie)
From: hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter)
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:22:00 -0400
References: <C7D2CCBF.601F5%mark@rabinergroup.com> <27008001-D277-4603-992D-3E96FED9F2E7@bex.net> <000301cacdd5$a4fa5dc0$eeef1940$@net>

Of course, you're right. The episode is from just a few years ago, if that. 
Still, I'd have expected an ancient FTn or something of the sort. If he 
could afford the film. Otherwise, a 3MP P&S digicam.

?howard

On Mar 27, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Tom Schofield wrote:

> Compared to a modern DSLR, a $400 used 500c is the camera of unemployed
> slackers!  Of course, I would think a long lens would be that of choice for
> obsessed stalkers, unless they are quite brave or sneaky.
> 
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Humorous part was that it was the property of a penniless, unemployed
> ne'er-do-well slacker in a tiny English village who used it to
> surreptitiously photograph the object of his obsession. And I suppose
> developed the film himself.
> 
> -howard
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: Another maybe not so stupid GH1 question)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Hasselblad sighting (movie))
Message from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] Hasselblad sighting (movie))