Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:27:51 -0800
References: <C8FD7E98.6320%mark@rabinergroup.com> <529686F3EB724B03A0DEBEF92EFE19E1@syneticfeba505> <412B27BA635543079FFE29F57C2BAC41@jimnichols> <F3DF3F305FA74092AAE336FBD24F8DB2@syneticfeba505> <AANLkTi=mAfnYhRrwG9Z3iahGw3DR0K3C7s9iu7bfxZAU@mail.gmail.com>
God forbid me to disagree with Dr. Uncle Ted and (gasp) Mark, but you guys
talking about Avedon, or the latest focus on ultra sharp model shoots etc.
that's one thing, but if you actually take photos of any woman from late 20s
to 50s, and if you think they like that super sharp
Avedon-show-every-oh-so-true-emotion, I...
well, I don't know what to say :-) but you guys are ... incorrect.
Negative clarity in LR does wonder, but there's no fault of finding "softer"
glass for this portrait.
--
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]
Replies:
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))