Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/04/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Then and Now
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:27:24 -0400
References: <2143058198.82035.1334937697291.JavaMail.root@mail12.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <3EDDDC76-C8C6-43A7-AE5B-7874B4196EE3@frozenlight.eu> <21478B6F-8C7B-4D88-B34D-8FADF40AAC7B@usjet.net> <CAFfkXxvsM0ukcnhTAL3j_zAHELK+G5uLdwrFNYep8Un_q2=Ong@mail.gmail.com> <FE53E5B5-3F8C-4EA4-8E05-B62C46730640@usjet.net> <15BA6267-186A-4030-B37F-680F13123284@embarqmail.com> <5798AAB5-DE88-44A1-9138-6785EE4193F6@usjet.net>
did not mean that to be ad hominem--just saying that they appear to be more
political, than scientific
their numbers differ greatly from the VAST majority of scientific
measurments and conclusions
my suspicions and their behavior make it likely that anti-regulation money
is at the base of their opinions
ric
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:54 AM, Robert Meier wrote:
> Aside from the ad hominem attacks, what about the merits of their argument
> and data?
Replies:
Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)
In reply to:
Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] IMG: Then and Now)