Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:36:35 +0530
References: <002401cd49a0$672119f0$35634dd0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CBFE6E1C.1F963%mark@rabinergroup.com> <002701cd49a2$3b3b15f0$b1b141d0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <79B2E58D-9E53-4551-8CDC-95B1C5391175@gmail.com> <F2012076-5B76-41BE-AF78-66EA29502829@gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ3NhfabkmvPeq9W6ryyMxcd9Vv=pNA=B7XVbSAr19MSKA@mail.gmail.com> <A9724320-954A-469D-9F4A-EAB757E5CC41@gmail.com>

Steve,
That should read May 26th...
Cheers
Jayanand

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 8:48 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>
> > Steve,
> > Conclusions quoted verbatim below - from the March 26th issue of Amateur
> > Photographer.
> > Cheers
> > Jayanand
>
>
> thank you Jay....
>
> >
> > Conclusion:
> >
> > Although the Leica M9 is now almost three years old, its image quality
> when
> > shooting RAW images is still a match for its modern counterparts. The
> rest
> > of its specification does look a little dated, though. The high
> resolution
> > and extended features list of the Sony NEX-7 makes it a serious candidate
> > as an affordable alternative to the M9, but using one is a very different
> > experience. If you like the idea of a high-end compact system camera and
> > are more used to a conventional DSLR, then the NEX-7 is probably the
> camera
> > for you.
> >
> > However, if you are looking for an experience that is more akin to using
> an
> > M9, then the Fujifilm X-Pro 1 is the best alternative. Its RAW and JPEG
> > images are excellent, and the camera's build and hybrid viewfinder are
> more
> > than a match for the M9 - in many ways the X-Pro 1 is actually better,
> and
> > significantly less expensive.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
> > gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jun 13, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, Amateur Photographer magazine did a comparitive review of the
> >> Leica M9, Fuji X-Pro 1 and the Sony Nex 7 in their May 26th issue, in
> case
> >> someone is interested.
> >>
> >>
> >> yes, haven't seen it...results?
> >>
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Leica M lenses on the Fuji X-Pro 1)