Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: TheLEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 06:42:02 -0800
References: <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <r01050300-0921-F650A781263611D88AC25C10A1E6DFE0@[66.239.168.2]> <22575221-26C8-11D8-8437-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <5.2.1.1.2.20031205000144.0e4227c8@192.168.100.11> <3FD08182.DED6D8E0@rabinergroup.com>

Mark,

It's a very simple rule: "NEVER WORK ON THE ORIGINAL!"

Make a copy and have a go. If it doesn't work, start over with step 1. 
(Make a copy).

And Canon's RAW format works the very same way with Photoshop. Though 
you'll need Photoshop 8 (CS) to work with the latest crop of cameras 
like the EOS Digital Rebel.

On Dec 5, 2003, at 5:00 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> "Raw seems less raw than Nikons NEF which is their Raw. And in which 
> you
> can adjust the white point and EV's as if you were just taking the
> picture. Only you are at your computer dealing with an image which 
> you'd
> taken in the past. To me that's pretty amazing. And a bummer Photoshop
> can't save it back into that format.
Eric Welch
Carlsbad, CA
http://www.jphotog.com

His bad opponent's "facts" he sweeps away,
And drags his sophistry to light of day;
Then swears they're pushed to madness who resort
To falsehood of so desperate a sort.
Not so; like sods upon a dead man's breast,
He lies most lightly who the least is pressed.
                                                         Polydore Smith

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@imagist.cnc.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: TheLEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))