Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 06:33:08 -0800
References: <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <r01050300-0921-F650A781263611D88AC25C10A1E6DFE0@[66.239.168.2]> <22575221-26C8-11D8-8437-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <p05100318bbf5b1770ab5@[10.0.1.5]> <5.2.1.1.2.20031205000144.0e4227c8@192.168.100.11>
You are correct. But once that is done, the next step is software, and
it's your choice.
And don't forget, film does the same thing. Each silver grain and dye
cloud is pretty much the equivalent, and our eyes do the interpolation.
On Dec 5, 2003, at 12:02 AM, Richard F. Man wrote:
> Ahh.... I'm not an expert on this, but "raw" is not raw since the
> camera needs to color interpolate the sensor data, if nothing else?
Eric Welch
Carlsbad, CA
http://www.jphotog.com
Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@imagist.cnc.net> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))
Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux not same as Lumix apparently (was Re: The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced))