Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Sun Sep 3 18:41:29 2006
References: <200609031717.k83HCoBM096229@server1.waverley.reid.org> <44FB44DF.6020609@telefonica.net> <7.0.1.0.0.20060903142519.01c04658@telus.net> <82c9dd70609031705h2cf8c3c4p159ac7eb0bf60519@mail.gmail.com> <44FB7166.7010205@adrenaline.com> <5e126477e50bd2ba791a0df693c01540@earthlink.net> <9b678e0609031803g19a34786n313240a56c552a63@mail.gmail.com> <2dd1b41bc9f419a49223c6a8fb91531e@earthlink.net>
On Sep 3, 2006, at 6:38 PM, I wrote:
> For those who are interested in a comparison between the Canon 1Ds mk
> II I suggest reading a few of the first pages of the thread at
duh... that's a comparison of the Canon with the DMR
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
In reply to:
Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at telus.net (David Young) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))