Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] R10 news
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sat Nov 1 18:54:04 2008
References: <31873962.1225546045978.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hound.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <3cad89990811011029p1f8b1d39mb22c5ec9ece8999c@mail.gmail.com> <462C4DCF-379E-4F85-A15D-2087996C1F11@cox.net>

Steve,
I agree absolutely - equipment does not matter at all. But it does Leica no
good to have cheerleaders who do not look at the negatives of their approach
- I think the final pressure on a company to change is always, in the final
analysis, applied by the customer. For example however good the M8 may be,
and I have not used one so I dont know, the necessity to use IR filters is a
gigantic misstep, which a  company of Leica's size can ill afford. However
practically everyone on the list played apologist, and those who had bought
M8s went out of their way to say that it was no big deal. Well it was - I
would have definitely bought one but for this, and I have a dozen friends
who would have, too. Leica can ill afford to lose sales like this. I still
say that if a camera is so good, we would see professionals, who make a
living shooting photographs using it. It does Leica no good, in the long
run, at their prices, to target sales of a camera either to an aging fan
club, or to a younger generation as a fashion accessory.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote:

>
> On Nov 1, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>
>  Doug,
>> I disagree - they are well on the way. Look at the new Nikon zooms -
>> 14-24,
>> 24-70 and the 200-400 - I have no experience with Canon. Leica make great
>> lenses, but don't sell many, and it wont change whatever happens. I am
>> sure
>> the Nikon D3 with the 200-400 would do wonders for your bird photography.
>> It
>> makes no sense to be blind to the demerits of a brand - by all means shoot
>> what you want, but keep your mind open to reality. IMHO the number of bird
>> photographers using the DMR can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and
>> there must be a reason for it - otherwise it would be the equipment of
>> choice for them.
>>
>
> and somehow Jayanand (and I know you know this) we always seem to play up
> the equipment here, as the be all and end all,
>
> forgetting other factors....
>
> like,
>
> it takes more than great equipment to take great pictures...
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>  If it is the benchmark, I dont see it used as such by any
>> reviewer of cameras. Therefore in the real world, except for a few of us
>> in
>> this list, who have the interest and the time, it is really irrelevant.
>> BTW, the only magazine I saw the M8 recommended (as a must buy toy, like
>> the
>> Iphone) is Esquire or GQ, I forget which - if Leica has to survive on
>> sales
>> to the general readership of those magazines, they are gone. To most of
>> the
>> inhabitants of the world, cameras are discretionary purchases, and I
>> expect
>> sales to really go down everywhere with the present crisis, especially at
>> the top end of the market. C,N & S will survive that, but what about
>> Leica?
>> I will make a prediction that one of the Japanese companies, probably
>> Matsushita, will buy them within the next 3 years.
>> Cheers
>> Jayanand
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 6:57 PM, <wildlightphoto@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>  A. Lal wrote:
>>>
>>>  I had a chance to speak to Ms. Harbets  at the Leica booth at NY
>>>>
>>> Photo-Expo
>>>
>>>> last week. I'd be very surprised if the R 10 goes on sale before the
>>>> next
>>>> Photokina.  By then C, N and S will probably have 30 meg sensors in
>>>> their
>>>> top  bodies. Not sure what  Leica need to compete.
>>>>
>>>
>>> C, N and S will need to revamp much of their lens lineup in order to take
>>> advantage of 30MP sensors.  Early results from the 5DII suggest that its
>>> sensor is overkill for many of the EF lenses.  Absent a completely new
>>> set
>>> of lenses, C, N and S will do better to address bit depth and DR
>>> deficiencies.
>>>
>>> Doug Herr
>>> Birdman of Sacramento
>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] R10 news)
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] R10 news)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] R10 news)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] R10 news)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] R10 news)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] R10 news)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] R10 news)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] R10 news)