Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:13:38 -0800
References: <152.29b08df6.2d4d03bc@aol.com> <00cd01c3e84d$f159b5e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <401C561E.4020704@wanadoo.nl> <11931990-5464-11D8-89A9-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <1075607857.18186.47.camel@creo_pc3> <401D1620.5030606@osheaven.net> <EBDBB269-54D1-11D8-8FF8-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <401DFA7C.5020205@osheaven.net> <093E50AF-558F-11D8-8FF8-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0402030829220.4517@hedvig.uio.no> <D7FC4774-5658-11D8-A0C4-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <003901c3eaf2$0be29610$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>

Sure,

So, what's the most neutral slide film these days? Is it still 
Ektachrome 100 Pro?

Eric Welch
Carlsbad, CA
http://www.jphotog.com

AAAAAA - American Association Against Acronym Abuse Anonymous
On Feb 3, 2004, at 11:39 PM, animal wrote:

> back to film?
> http://www.wisner.com/freedom.htm
> simon
>
>> The D10 and D60 and D300 all use the exact same CMOS chip. I'm not 
>> sure
>> about the
>> G5, though I doubt it. I have a G3 and it's MUCH noisier than the
>> DSLRs. I bought a D300 because it was such a good deal I couldn't pass
>> it up. But in the long run, I'll get either the D10 or the 1D Mark II.
>>
>> It's still pretty accepted most places I've read the Canon CMOS chips
>> are better than Nikon in noise. And now with the D1 Mark II,
>> performance has surpassed Nikon's CCD chips as well. But in the end, I
>> don't think you could go wrong with either system. And I bet whatever
>> Leica comes out with will be just as good too in real terms. Noise is
>> also a function of software. And there is software coming in the 
>> market
>> to reduce noise post-exposure.
>>
>> Anyway, I think we ought to steer back to Leica talk. :-)
>>
>> Eric
>> Carlsbad, CA
>>
>> A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by
>> little statesmen, philosophers, and divines. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
>> On Feb 2, 2004, at 11:33 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>>
>>> Do the low-end Canons (10D is the lowest I want to go, I think) now
>>> allow
>>> exposure indexes higher than 1600?
>>>
>>> Does the G5 use a CMOS chip like the DSLR's (not the same, but same
>>> family
>>> of technology)?
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, see 
>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Teresa299@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Fw: [Large Format] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 ForCampaign Coverage)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)